Greenspan v. East 33rd Street Realty Corp.
This text of 169 Misc. 353 (Greenspan v. East 33rd Street Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The language of section 234 of the Peal Property-Law, providing that agreements exempting lessors of real property from liability for negligence “ shall be deemed to be void as against public policy and wholly unenforceable,” embraces prior as well as future agreements and we have no right to engraft an exception not made by the Legislature. (Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Mottley, 219 U. S. 467.) The application of the section to prior leases is not precluded by constitutional prohibitions. (People ex rel. Durham Realty Co. v. LaFetra, 230 N. Y. 429.)
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. y
All concur. Present — Lydon, Frankenthaler and Shientag, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
169 Misc. 353, 7 N.Y.S.2d 727, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenspan-v-east-33rd-street-realty-corp-nyappterm-1938.