Greenspan v. Antin

New York Court of Appeals

Greenspan v. Antin

413 N.E.2d 1175, 51 N.Y.2d 851, 433 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2699

DecidedOctober 16, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 413 N.E.2d 1175 (Greenspan v. Antin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greenspan v. Antin, 413 N.E.2d 1175, 51 N.Y.2d 851, 433 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2699 (N.Y. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

[853]*853OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

In the light of the son’s ready admission of his departure from the rules, and for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division, the order appealed from should be affirmed.

We add that, -our holding does not turn on whether the action, as it was denominated by the appellant, is one for a declaratory judgment, or whether, as converted by the Appellate Division, it is to be treated as an article 78 proceeding. It is, therefore, not necessary to deal with this procedural aspect of the case.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI