Greenpoint Savings Bank v. Hill
This text of 228 A.D.2d 412 (Greenpoint Savings Bank v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying her motion to vacate the prior order entered on her default, since the appellant failed to establish a reasonable excuse for her default and a meritorious defense (see, CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Fennell v Mason, 204 AD2d 599; Putney v Pearlman, 203 AD2d 333). Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Copertino, Santucci and Gold-stein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
228 A.D.2d 412, 643 N.Y.2d 424, 643 N.Y.S.2d 424, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenpoint-savings-bank-v-hill-nyappdiv-1996.