Greenpoint Savings Bank v. Hill
228 A.D.2d 412, 643 N.Y.2d 424, 643 N.Y.S.2d 424, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6245
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 3, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying her motion to vacate the prior order entered on her default, since the appellant failed to establish a reasonable excuse for her default and a meritorious defense (see, CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Fennell v Mason, 204 AD2d 599; Putney v Pearlman, 203 AD2d 333). Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Copertino, Santucci and Gold-stein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Greenpoint Savings Bank v. Hill, 228 A.D.2d 412, 643 N.Y.2d 424, 643 N.Y.S.2d 424, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6245 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
228 A.D.2d 412 (Greenpoint Savings Bank v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Political Marketing International, Inc. v. Jaliman
67 A.D.3d 661 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)