Greenough v. Eichholtz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Greenough v. Eichholtz

15 A. 712, 1 Monag. 433, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 732

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 1, 1888

DocketNo. 413

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 15 A. 712 (Greenough v. Eichholtz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greenough v. Eichholtz, 15 A. 712, 1 Monag. 433, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 732 (Pa. 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This was a case for the jury, and was submitted to that body by the court under a full and careful charge. In the face of the testimony of Eichholtz, it is folly to urge that there was not an original undertaking on part of the defendants to pay for the paper book. If his testimony was believed, as it seems to have been, the work was finished on the credit of the defendants; and the undertaking was not to pay the debt of another, for, without their promise, the work would never have been performed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

This was a case for the jury, and was submitted to that body by the court under a full and careful charge. In the face of the testimony of Eichholtz, it is folly to urge that there was not an original undertaking on part of the defendants to pay for the paper book. If his testimony was believed, as it seems to have been, the work was finished on the credit of the defendants; and the undertaking was not to pay the debt of another, for, without their promise, the work would never have been performed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 A. 712, 1 Monag. 433, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenough-v-eichholtz-pa-1888.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack