Greenman v. Reilly

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedOctober 1, 2001
Docket01-1221
StatusPublished

This text of Greenman v. Reilly (Greenman v. Reilly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greenman v. Reilly, (1st Cir. 2001).

Opinion

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 01-1221

WENDELL GREENMAN,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Defendant, Appellee. ____________________

No. 01-1295

GEORGE E. DONOVAN,

Defendant, Appellee.

APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Rya W. Zobel, U.S. District Judge]

Before

Boudin, Chief Judge, Torruella and Lynch, Circuit Judges. Wendell Greenman on brief pro se. George F. Donovan on brief pro se. Thomas F. Reilly, Attorney General, and James J. Arguin, Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellee.

September 27, 2001 Per Curiam. In these consolidated appeals,

appellants, who are state inmates serving life sentences for

second-degree murder, appeal from the dismissal of their

suit for declaratory relief. Appellants asked the district

court to find their statutes of conviction to be

unconstitutional. Although this is a habeas claim,

appellants have not stated that they have exhausted their

state remedies. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal of

their suit, essentially for the reasons given by the

district judge in her Memorandum of Decision dated January

8, 2001 and by the appellee in his appellate brief.

Affirmed. See Loc. R. 27(c).

-3-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Greenman v. Reilly, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenman-v-reilly-ca1-2001.