Greenman v. Greenman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Greenman v. Greenman

384 So. 2d 1303, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16337

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 4, 1980

DocketNo. 79-856

StatusPublished

This text of 384 So. 2d 1303 (Greenman v. Greenman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greenman v. Greenman, 384 So. 2d 1303, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16337 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

LETTS, Chief Judge.

On the authority of Zalka v. Zalka, 100 So.2d 157 (Fla.1958); Sheppard v. Sheppard, 45 So.2d 505 (Fla.1950); Rogoff v. Rogoff, 115 So.2d 456 (Fla.3d DCA 1959), and Landsberg v. Landsberg, 115 So.2d 456 (Fla.3d DCA 1959), and Landsberg v. Landsberg, 259 So.2d 727 (Fla.3d DCA 1972), this cause is remanded to the trial court below with directions that the portion of the final judgment awarding the appellant-wife a monetary sum per month, entitled “family support,” should be modified to identify a portion of such sum as alimony and the remaining portion as child support.

We find no other error and accordingly, the final judgment is affirmed with directions to modify the final judgment in accordance herewith.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

MOORE and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LETTS, Chief Judge.

On the authority of Zalka v. Zalka, 100 So.2d 157 (Fla.1958); Sheppard v. Sheppard, 45 So.2d 505 (Fla.1950); Rogoff v. Rogoff, 115 So.2d 456 (Fla.3d DCA 1959), and Landsberg v. Landsberg, 115 So.2d 456 (Fla.3d DCA 1959), and Landsberg v. Landsberg, 259 So.2d 727 (Fla.3d DCA 1972), this cause is remanded to the trial court below with directions that the portion of the final judgment awarding the appellant-wife a monetary sum per month, entitled “family support,” should be modified to identify a portion of such sum as alimony and the remaining portion as child support.

We find no other error and accordingly, the final judgment is affirmed with directions to modify the final judgment in accordance herewith.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

MOORE and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

384 So. 2d 1303, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenman-v-greenman-fladistctapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack