Greenman V. Carpenter

Supreme Court of Georgia

Greenman V. Carpenter

140 S.E. 356, 165 Ga. 176, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 341

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 17, 1927·No. No. 5829·Published

Opinion

Ciusert, J.

1. Considering' the charge as a whole and tire portions upon which error is assigned, in connection with the plaintiff’s petition, none of the grounds of the motion relating to the charge show error.

2. The ground complaining that the court allowed the defendant to testify as to “communications and contracts” with her husband is incomplete, as it sets out no evidence.

3. The verdict is supported by evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ciusert, J.

1. Considering' the charge as a whole and tire portions upon which error is assigned, in connection with the plaintiff’s petition, none of the grounds of the motion relating to the charge show error.

2. The ground complaining that the court allowed the defendant to testify as to “communications and contracts” with her husband is incomplete, as it sets out no evidence.

3. The verdict is supported by evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Greenman V. Carpenter, 140 S.E. 356, 165 Ga. 176, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 341 (Ga. 1927).

Pincite

140 S.E. 356 (Greenman V. Carpenter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.