Greenman v. Attorney General

First Circuit

Greenman v. Attorney General

19 F. App'x 9

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided September 27, 2001·No. Nos. 01-1221, 01-1295·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, appellants, who are state inmates serving life sentences for second-degree murder, appeal from the dismissal of their suit for declaratory relief. Appellants asked the district court to find their statutes of conviction to be unconstitutional. Although this is a habeas claim, appellants have not stated that they have exhausted their state remedies. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal of their suit, essentially for the reasons given by the district judge in her Memorandum of Decision dated January 8, 2001 and by the appellee in his appellate brief.

Affirmed. See Loe. R. 27(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, appellants, who are state inmates serving life sentences for second-degree murder, appeal from the dismissal of their suit for declaratory relief. Appellants asked the district court to find their statutes of conviction to be unconstitutional. Although this is a habeas claim, appellants have not stated that they have exhausted their state remedies. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal of their suit, essentially for the reasons given by the district judge in her Memorandum of Decision dated January 8, 2001 and by the appellee in his appellate brief.

Affirmed. See Loe. R. 27(c).

Greenman v. Attorney General, 19 F. App'x 9 (1st Cir. 2001).

Pincite

19 F. App'x 9 (Greenman v. Attorney General) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related