Greenlich v. Rose
This text of 2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 174 (Greenlich v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment was recovered June 22,. 1818, and the execution was. issued June 8, 1885, about seven years afterwards. It has been returned wholly unsatisfied. The validity of the execution cannot be [175]*175inquired into on the return of an order in supplementary proceedings (Sanford v. Sinclair, 8 Paige, 3/3; Union Bank v. Sargeant, 53 Barb. 422; 35 How. Pr. 87). It can be attacked only on a special motion to set the execution aside. The motion to vacate the suplemental order will therefore be denied. Unless the defendant submits to an examination thereunder on the 20th inst., at 10 A.51, an attachment will be issued.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenlich-v-rose-nynyccityct-1885.