Greenleaf v. Public Service Corp.

92 A. 344, 88 N.J.L. 715, 3 Gummere 715, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 343
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 16, 1914·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This, and the case of Sarah Miller and Albert Miller, against the same defendant, reported in 86 N. J. L. 631, were tried below, and argued in this court together, and as both eases rest upon the same facts, the result in one controls the other, and the judgment in this ease will be affirmed, for the reasons given for affirmance in the other case, decided at this term.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgti, Williams, JJ. 10.

For reversal—Garrison, Kalisch, Black, Heppeniieimer, JJ. 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Greenleaf v. Public Service Corp., 92 A. 344, 88 N.J.L. 715, 3 Gummere 715, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 343 (N.J. 1914).

92 A. 344 (Greenleaf v. Public Service Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. Utah Light & Traction Co.
86 P.2d 37 (Utah Supreme Court, 1939)