Greenleaf v. Public Service Corp.
Opinion
This, and the case of Sarah Miller and Albert Miller, against the same defendant, reported in 86 N. J. L. 631, were tried below, and argued in this court together, and as both eases rest upon the same facts, the result in one controls the other, and the judgment in this ease will be affirmed, for the reasons given for affirmance in the other case, decided at this term.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgti, Williams, JJ. 10.
For reversal—Garrison, Kalisch, Black, Heppeniieimer, JJ. 4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
92 A. 344 (Greenleaf v. Public Service Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.