Greenleaf v. Public Service Corp.
This text of 92 A. 344 (Greenleaf v. Public Service Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This, and the case of Sarah Miller and Albert Miller, against the same defendant, reported in 86 N. J. L. 631, were tried below, and argued in this court together, and as both eases rest upon the same facts, the result in one controls the other, and the judgment in this ease will be affirmed, for the reasons given for affirmance in the other case, decided at this term.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgti, Williams, JJ. 10.
For reversal—Garrison, Kalisch, Black, Heppeniieimer, JJ. 4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 A. 344, 88 N.J.L. 715, 3 Gummere 715, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenleaf-v-public-service-corp-nj-1914.