Greenleaf v. Dyer

• Court: Superior Court of Maine
• Decided: November 16, 2011
• Docket: CUMap-11-025
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CUMBERLAND, ss CIVIL ACTION Docket No. AP-11-025 ~~ 11 (lj fV1 -- c \;\ ;\ \- I I !?'.; I ! vi

CHERYL GREENLEAF,

Plaintiff DECISION AND ORDER v.

PAUL DYER, i '·'

Defendant

The defendant appeals the default judgment against him entered in the

District Court. For the following reasons, the judgment is AFFIRMED.

In August 2010, the plaintiff filed a statement of claim against Tax

Partners, LLC, in the District Court. (Ex. F.) She also filed statements of claim

against Paul Dyer and Thomas Hicks individually in March 2011. (Exs. B, D.) In

these statements of claim, she requested $2797.50 from Mr. Dyer, $2797.50 from

Mr. Hicks, and/ or $5595.00 from Tax Partners based on a "money-back

guarantee" and the "failure to pay refund of engagement fee/ subscription fee."

(Exs. B, D, F.)

The record reflects that Mr. Dyer was notified of the statement of claim

against him by certified mail, and the clerk of the court sent him notice of the

May 26, 2011, hearing. (Ex. A.) Despite this notice, Mr. Dyer failed to appear at

the hearing. The presiding judge entered a default judgment against Mr. Dyer

for $2,797.50 plus costs. (Judg. dated 5/26/ 11; M.R.S.C.P. 8(b).)

1 Upon receiving notice of this judgment, Mr. Dyer filed a Rule 60(b)

request to vacate judgment on June 13, 2011. See Richter v. Ercolini, 2010 ME 38,

<]I 11, 994 A.2d 404 ("In cases in which a defaulted defendant failed to appear

before the entry of a default judgment, [appellate] decisions require that the

defaulted defendant file a Rule 60(b) motion in the trial court before seeking

appellate review."). The motion was denied on June 21, 2011. The presiding

judge noted that "notice of hearing was properly given and received." (Mot.

Vacate 2.) Mr. Dyer filed an appeal in the Superior Court on June 27, 2011. S~E'

M.R.S.C.P. ll(a) ("An aggrieved party may appeal from a judgment of the

District Court in a small claims action to the Superior Court in the county in

which the division of the District Court entering judgment is located. The time

within which an appeal may be taken shall be 30 days .... ").

:Discussion

The Small Claims Act was created "for the purpose of providing a simple,

speedy and informal court procedure for the resolution of small claims." 14

M.R.S. § 7481 (2010). "Only if a defendant appears and defends in Small Claims

Court can the merits of a plaintiff's claim be tested and a judgment for the

defendant be possible." B & H OjJCo._y,_Dine_~l}J 557 A.2d 604, 605 (Me. 1989).

In his appeal of the default judgment, Mr. Dyer did not request a jury trial

de novo. As a result, the Superior Court may only consider questions of law.

M.R.S.C.P. ll(c)(2). Mr. Dyer argues that he did not receive proper notice of the

court date. (Mot. Vacate 1.) What actions are "legally sufficient to constitute

effective service" is a legal question. Maguire Constr. Inc. v. Forester:_ 2006 ME

112,

the statement of claim and the clerk's office sent a notice of small claims hearing

2 to the defendant. 1 Notice of hearing was properly given. See M.R.S.C.P. 4(a)(2),

(f) (outlining requirements for service and notice in small claims proceedings).

The entry is

The Judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

Dated: November 15, 2011 Nancy Mills Justice, Superior Court

1 A plaintiff may serve the defendant "by mailing a copy of the statement of claim, first class, postage prepaid, registered or certified, restricted delivery, return receipt requested, to the person to be served." M.R.S.C.P. 4(a)(2). "Notice of hearing date and time shall be mailed to the plaintiff and defendant by the clerk at the addresses provided on the statement of claim unless the clerk is notified by the party of a different address." M.R.S.C.P. 4(f).

3 Date Filed _ _7 -_8_-_1_1_ __ CUMBERLAND Docket No. _ _A_P_-_1_1-_2_5_ _ _---.J County

Action __D_I_S_T_R_I_C_T_C_OU_R_T_AP_P_E_A_L_ _ _ _ __

CHERYL GREENLEAF CPA PAUL DYER

vs. Plaintiff's Attorney Defendant's Attorney PRO SE PRO SE 31 STANFORD LANE 16 PHILLIPS RD SCARBOROUGH ME 04074 GLENBURN ME 04401

Date of Entry