Greenidge v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Greenidge v. New York City Transit Authority

267 A.D.2d 80, 699 N.Y.S.2d 679, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12717

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 9, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 267 A.D.2d 80 (Greenidge v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greenidge v. New York City Transit Authority, 267 A.D.2d 80, 699 N.Y.S.2d 679, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12717 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas McKeon, J.), entered June 8, 1998, which, in a personal injury action, compelled defendant to comply with certain outstanding discovery and, in connection therewith, directed that the parties set a date for an expert’s inspection of an allegedly defective subway car panel, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court properly exercised its discretion when it entertained and granted plaintiff’s application for inspection of the subway panel that allegedly struck and injured plaintiff (see, CPLR 2214, 3101, 3120; Matter of Shanty Hollow Corp. v Poladian, 23 AD2d 132, affd 17 NY2d 536). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Lerner and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas McKeon, J.), entered June 8, 1998, which, in a personal injury action, compelled defendant to comply with certain outstanding discovery and, in connection therewith, directed that the parties set a date for an expert’s inspection of an allegedly defective subway car panel, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court properly exercised its discretion when it entertained and granted plaintiff’s application for inspection of the subway panel that allegedly struck and injured plaintiff (see, CPLR 2214, 3101, 3120; Matter of Shanty Hollow Corp. v Poladian, 23 AD2d 132, affd 17 NY2d 536). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Lerner and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 A.D.2d 80, 699 N.Y.S.2d 679, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenidge-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack