Greenidge v. Anchor Construction, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Greenidge v. Anchor Construction, Inc.

303 A.D.2d 179, 755 N.Y.S.2d 239, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2231

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 6, 2003·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered May 3, 2002, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment as to liability upon his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The uncontradicted proof demonstrated that plaintiff, while installing an electrical fixture on the ceiling of defendant Anchor’s premises, fell when the ladder upon which he was standing slipped. Inasmuch as it is plain that the ladder was inadequate to protect plaintiff from the risks to which he was exposed by reason of the^ particular elevated work he was performing and that plaintiff was not furnished any other safety device, the grant of summary judgment as to liability upon plaintiffs Labor Law § 240 (1) claim was proper (see Cruz v Turner Constr. Co., 279 AD2d 322 [2001]; Spaulding v Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 271 AD2d 316 [2000]). Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Williams and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered May 3, 2002, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment as to liability upon his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The uncontradicted proof demonstrated that plaintiff, while installing an electrical fixture on the ceiling of defendant Anchor’s premises, fell when the ladder upon which he was standing slipped. Inasmuch as it is plain that the ladder was inadequate to protect plaintiff from the risks to which he was exposed by reason of the^ particular elevated work he was performing and that plaintiff was not furnished any other safety device, the grant of summary judgment as to liability upon plaintiffs Labor Law § 240 (1) claim was proper (see Cruz v Turner Constr. Co., 279 AD2d 322 [2001]; Spaulding v Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 271 AD2d 316 [2000]). Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Williams and Marlow, JJ.

Greenidge v. Anchor Construction, Inc., 303 A.D.2d 179, 755 N.Y.S.2d 239, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2231 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

303 A.D.2d 179 (Greenidge v. Anchor Construction, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related