Greenhow v. Harrison
This text of 21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 333 (Greenhow v. Harrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause should be stricken from the files. There is no right giyen in the statute to prosecute error to the judgment of the court if in session, of the judgment of- a judge in vacation, on an appeal from the determination by a justice of the peace on a’ motion to discharge an attachment. Section 6494 Rev. Stat. provides that the judgment rendered on the appeal is to be transmitted to the justice of the' peace to be by him entered as his final judgment on the motion, and if error is to be prosecuted, it is to the judgment of the justice of the-peace, and not to the judgment of the court or judge rendering the judgment on the appeal. . See Williams v. McCartney, 30 O. C. C. 320 (10 N. S. 161).
This proceeding is to reverse the judgment of the court of common pleas on appeal from the determination of the justice of the peace of the motion to discharge an attachment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenhow-v-harrison-ohiocirct-1908.