Greenhow v. Harrison

Hamilton Circuit Court

Greenhow v. Harrison

12 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 128, 1908 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 265

DecidedDecember 19, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 12 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 128 (Greenhow v. Harrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hamilton Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greenhow v. Harrison, 12 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 128, 1908 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 265 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

This cause should be stricken from the files. There is no right given in the statute to prosecute error to the judgment of the court if in session, or the judgment of a judge in vacation, on an appeal from the determination by a justice of the peace on a motion to discharge an attachment. Section 6494, Revised Statutes, provides that the judgment rendered on the appeal is to be transmitted to the justice of the peace to be by him entered as his final judgment on the motion, and if error is to be prosecuted, it is to the judgment of the justice of the peace, and not to the judgment of the court or judge rendering the judgment on the appeal. See Williams v. McCartney, 10 C. C.—N. S., 161.

This proceeding is to reverse the judgment of the court .of common pleas on appeal from the determination of the justice ol the peace of the motion to discharge an attachment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This cause should be stricken from the files. There is no right given in the statute to prosecute error to the judgment of the court if in session, or the judgment of a judge in vacation, on an appeal from the determination by a justice of the peace on a motion to discharge an attachment. Section 6494, Revised Statutes, provides that the judgment rendered on the appeal is to be transmitted to the justice of the peace to be by him entered as his final judgment on the motion, and if error is to be prosecuted, it is to the judgment of the justice of the peace, and not to the judgment of the court or judge rendering the judgment on the appeal. See Williams v. McCartney, 10 C. C.—N. S., 161.

This proceeding is to reverse the judgment of the court .of common pleas on appeal from the determination of the justice ol the peace of the motion to discharge an attachment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 128, 1908 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenhow-v-harrison-ohcircthamilton-1908.