Greenhouse v. Greenhouse
This text of 913 So. 2d 1201 (Greenhouse v. Greenhouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the temporary support order. The trial court abused its discretion-in ordering the husband to pay $3,000 per month in undifferentiated support to the wife, as there was no evidence in the record to support the conclusion that the husband had the ability to pay this amount. Further, in making the undifferentiated award, the trial court did not identify “which share of the award was for child support and which was intended to be alimony.” Blum v. Blum, 769 So.2d 1142, 1143 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); see Fleischfresser v. Accursio, 833 So.2d 803, 804 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
913 So. 2d 1201, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 16255, 2005 WL 2508581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenhouse-v-greenhouse-fladistctapp-2005.