Greenhoff v. Greenhoff

Missouri Court of Appeals

Greenhoff v. Greenhoff

520 S.W.3d 837, 2017 WL 2829299, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 663

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 30, 2017

DocketNo. ED 104802

StatusPublished

This text of 520 S.W.3d 837 (Greenhoff v. Greenhoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greenhoff v. Greenhoff, 520 S.W.3d 837, 2017 WL 2829299, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 663 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Jennifer Greenhoff (Appellant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Franklin County, in favor of Ryann Green-hoff (Respondent), denying her motion to set aside the parties’ judgment of dissolution. Appellant’s sole point on appeal is that the trial court erred in denying her motion because she met the requirements of Rule 74.06(b)(2) to set aside the parties’ judgment of dissolution on the basis of fraud. Finding no error, we affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Jennifer Greenhoff (Appellant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Franklin County, in favor of Ryann Green-hoff (Respondent), denying her motion to set aside the parties’ judgment of dissolution. Appellant’s sole point on appeal is that the trial court erred in denying her motion because she met the requirements of Rule 74.06(b)(2) to set aside the parties’ judgment of dissolution on the basis of fraud. Finding no error, we affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

520 S.W.3d 837, 2017 WL 2829299, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenhoff-v-greenhoff-moctapp-2017.