Greenhoff v. Greenhoff

Missouri Court of Appeals

Greenhoff v. Greenhoff

520 S.W.3d 837, 2017 WL 2829299, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 663

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 2017·No. No. ED 104802·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Jennifer Greenhoff (Appellant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Franklin County, in favor of Ryann Green-hoff (Respondent), denying her motion to set aside the parties’ judgment of dissolution. Appellant’s sole point on appeal is that the trial court erred in denying her motion because she met the requirements of Rule 74.06(b)(2) to set aside the parties’ judgment of dissolution on the basis of fraud. Finding no error, we affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Jennifer Greenhoff (Appellant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Franklin County, in favor of Ryann Green-hoff (Respondent), denying her motion to set aside the parties’ judgment of dissolution. Appellant’s sole point on appeal is that the trial court erred in denying her motion because she met the requirements of Rule 74.06(b)(2) to set aside the parties’ judgment of dissolution on the basis of fraud. Finding no error, we affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Greenhoff v. Greenhoff, 520 S.W.3d 837, 2017 WL 2829299, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 663 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

520 S.W.3d 837 (Greenhoff v. Greenhoff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.