Greenhill v. Shands Teaching Hospital & Clinics, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Greenhill v. Shands Teaching Hospital & Clinics, Inc.

834 So. 2d 896, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18614, 2002 WL 31833722

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 19, 2002

DocketNo. 1D01-1520

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 834 So. 2d 896 (Greenhill v. Shands Teaching Hospital & Clinics, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greenhill v. Shands Teaching Hospital & Clinics, Inc., 834 So. 2d 896, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18614, 2002 WL 31833722 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellants challenge an order by which their medical malpractice action was dismissed, upon a finding that they failed to comply with a pretrial conference order. As indicated in cases such as Commonwealth Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n v. Tubero, 569 So.2d 1271 (Fla.1990), dismissal is a severe sanction which should be used only in extreme circumstances. Tubero reiterated the description of such circumstances in Mercer v. Raine, 443 So.2d 944 (Fla.1983), referring to a deliberate and contumacious disregard of the court’s authority, or bad faith, willful disregard or gross indifference, or conduct which otherwise evinces deliberate callousness. Acknowledging the court’s discretion to sanction a party in these circumstances, Tubero requires that an order sanctioning a party by dismissal contain a finding which indicates that the party’s conduct was willful or deliberate. The appealed order in the present case does not contain such a finding, and in accordance with Tubero the order must be reversed. See, e.g., First Fairway Condominium I Ass’n v. Gulfstream Roofing, Inc., 701 So.2d 652 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). The appealed order is therefore reversed and the case is remanded.

ALLEN, C.J., DAVIS and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellants challenge an order by which their medical malpractice action was dismissed, upon a finding that they failed to comply with a pretrial conference order. As indicated in cases such as Commonwealth Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n v. Tubero, 569 So.2d 1271 (Fla.1990), dismissal is a severe sanction which should be used only in extreme circumstances. Tubero reiterated the description of such circumstances in Mercer v. Raine, 443 So.2d 944 (Fla.1983), referring to a deliberate and contumacious disregard of the court’s authority, or bad faith, willful disregard or gross indifference, or conduct which otherwise evinces deliberate callousness. Acknowledging the court’s discretion to sanction a party in these circumstances, Tubero requires that an order sanctioning a party by dismissal contain a finding which indicates that the party’s conduct was willful or deliberate. The appealed order in the present case does not contain such a finding, and in accordance with Tubero the order must be reversed. See, e.g., First Fairway Condominium I Ass’n v. Gulfstream Roofing, Inc., 701 So.2d 652 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). The appealed order is therefore reversed and the case is remanded.

ALLEN, C.J., DAVIS and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

834 So. 2d 896, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18614, 2002 WL 31833722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenhill-v-shands-teaching-hospital-clinics-inc-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack