Greenhall v. Rothschild

184 N.E. 59, 260 N.Y. 474, 1933 N.Y. LEXIS 782
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 10, 1933·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In view of the fact that the necessary parties for the probate of a will are not before the court, the decree should be modified by striking out of the first adjudicating clause of the decree the following words, “ was duly executed by Betty Hirsch and published, and declared by her to be her last will and testament and was not revoked by Betty Hirsch,” and by striking out the word probated ” in the third line from the end of that paragraph and inserting in place thereof the words “ Proceedings taken therein for its probate.” Also by *477 inserting in the second adjudicating clause after the word “ void ” in the second line from the end thereof, the words as to the defendants ” and in the eighth adjudicating paragraph after the word void ” in the last line, inserting the words as to them,” and as so modified the judgment should be affirmed, with costs to the respondent.

The judgment should be modified in accordance with this opinion and as so modified affirmed, with costs to respondent.

Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Greenhall v. Rothschild, 184 N.E. 59, 260 N.Y. 474, 1933 N.Y. LEXIS 782 (N.Y. 1933).

184 N.E. 59 (Greenhall v. Rothschild) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Hirsch
154 Misc. 736 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1935)