Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Greenhalgh v. State

Greenhalgh v. State

641 So. 2d 908, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7978, 1994 WL 487551
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 8, 1994
DocketNo. 94-01526
StatusPublished

This text of 641 So. 2d 908 (Greenhalgh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greenhalgh v. State, 641 So. 2d 908, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7978, 1994 WL 487551 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

The petitioner does not indicate the county and circuit of his conviction; nor does he state that he has filed a motion, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 which has been heard, determined and denied. We do not issue advisory opinions. State v. Vogel, 415 So.2d 821 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed without prejudice to the petitioner filing an appropriate petition in the proper jurisdiction.

It is so ordered.

NESBITT, LEVY and GODERICH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Vogel
415 So. 2d 821 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
641 So. 2d 908, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7978, 1994 WL 487551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenhalgh-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.