Greengate Grove Property Owners' Association, D/B/A Scoa, and Gill Karr, as Director of Greengate Grove Property Owners' Association v. Jurgen Schmeling

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 10, 2008
Docket13-06-00499-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Greengate Grove Property Owners' Association, D/B/A Scoa, and Gill Karr, as Director of Greengate Grove Property Owners' Association v. Jurgen Schmeling (Greengate Grove Property Owners' Association, D/B/A Scoa, and Gill Karr, as Director of Greengate Grove Property Owners' Association v. Jurgen Schmeling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greengate Grove Property Owners' Association, D/B/A Scoa, and Gill Karr, as Director of Greengate Grove Property Owners' Association v. Jurgen Schmeling, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-06-00499-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

GREENGATE GROVE PROPERTY OWNERS'

ASSOCIATION, D/B/A SCOA, AND GILL KARR,

AS DIRECTOR OF GREENGATE GROVE

PROPERTY OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, Appellants,



v.



JURGEN SCHMELING, ET AL., Appellees.

_____________________________________________________________



On appeal from the 206th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellants, Greengate Grove Property Owners' Association, d/b/a Scoa, and Gill Karr, as Director of Greengate Grove Property Owners' Association, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-564-02-D. Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties have reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants' unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). Appellants' motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Pursuant to the motion to dismiss, costs will be taxed against the party incurring the same. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellants' request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered

and filed this the 10th day of July, 2008.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Greengate Grove Property Owners' Association, D/B/A Scoa, and Gill Karr, as Director of Greengate Grove Property Owners' Association v. Jurgen Schmeling, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greengate-grove-property-owners-association-dba-scoa-and-gill-karr-as-texapp-2008.