Greengard v. Odorono Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Greengard v. Odorono Co.

235 A.D. 806, 256 N.Y.S. 708

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1932·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgments reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that plaintiffs made out a prima facie case for submission to the jury. The evidence of the chemist, Dr. Pozen, concerning the result of the application of certain chemicals in a solution to the human skin was admissible and was improperly excluded. (Scott v. State, 141 Ala. 1; Citizens’ Gas Light Co. v. O’Brien, 118 Ill. 174; Wigm. Ev. [2d ed.] §§ 555, 556, 560.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgments reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that plaintiffs made out a prima facie case for submission to the jury. The evidence of the chemist, Dr. Pozen, concerning the result of the application of certain chemicals in a solution to the human skin was admissible and was improperly excluded. (Scott v. State, 141 Ala. 1; Citizens’ Gas Light Co. v. O’Brien, 118 Ill. 174; Wigm. Ev. [2d ed.] §§ 555, 556, 560.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Greengard v. Odorono Co., 235 A.D. 806, 256 N.Y.S. 708 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

235 A.D. 806 (Greengard v. Odorono Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related