Greengard v. Odorono Co.
This text of 235 A.D. 806 (Greengard v. Odorono Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgments reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that plaintiffs made out a prima facie case for submission to the jury. The evidence of the chemist, Dr. Pozen, concerning the result of the application of certain chemicals in a solution to the human skin was admissible and was improperly excluded. (Scott v. State, 141 Ala. 1; Citizens’ Gas Light Co. v. O’Brien, 118 Ill. 174; Wigm. Ev. [2d ed.] §§ 555, 556, 560.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 A.D. 806, 256 N.Y.S. 708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greengard-v-odorono-co-nyappdiv-1932.