Greenfield v. Reland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Greenfield v. Reland

18 A.D.2d 1062, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3917

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 18, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 1062 (Greenfield v. Reland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greenfield v. Reland, 18 A.D.2d 1062, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered on September 28,1962, granting defendant Reland’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action for false arrest and imprisonment and the second cause of action for slander, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, to the extent of denying the motion as to the said two causes of action, and as so modified, affirmed, with costs to abide the event. There are issues of fact present as to whether or not the acts complained of were within the scope of defendant Harrison’s employment and in furtherance of defendant Reland’s interest. (See Sims v. Bergamo, 3 N Y 2d 531.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered on September 28,1962, granting defendant Reland’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action for false arrest and imprisonment and the second cause of action for slander, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, to the extent of denying the motion as to the said two causes of action, and as so modified, affirmed, with costs to abide the event. There are issues of fact present as to whether or not the acts complained of were within the scope of defendant Harrison’s employment and in furtherance of defendant Reland’s interest. (See Sims v. Bergamo, 3 N Y 2d 531.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 1062, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenfield-v-reland-nyappdiv-1963.