Greenfield v. Denner

160 N.E.2d 118, 6 N.Y.2d 867, 188 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 1294
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 29, 1959·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Orders of Appellate Division reversed and those of Special Term reinstated, as follows: The first cause of action is dismissed for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion in the Appellate Division; the defense of laches and estoppel is stricken from the amended answers to the second cause of action upon the ground that it is insufficient in law. Questions certified Nos. 1 and 4 answered in the negative; questions Nos. 2 and 3 not answered. No opinion.

Concur: Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Van Voorhis. Chief Judge Conway and Judges Froessel and Burke dissent and vote to affirm the order of the Appellate Division holding the first cause of action sufficient.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Greenfield v. Denner, 160 N.E.2d 118, 6 N.Y.2d 867, 188 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 1294 (N.Y. 1959).

160 N.E.2d 118 (Greenfield v. Denner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grato v. Grato
639 A.2d 390 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1994)
Friedman v. E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.
125 A.D.2d 539 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Abrams v. Donati
489 N.E.2d 751 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Rossi v. Kelly
96 A.D.2d 451 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Saxe, Bacon & Bolan, P.C. v. Martindale-Hubbell, Inc.
521 F. Supp. 1046 (S.D. New York, 1981)
Strain v. Seven Hills Associates
75 A.D.2d 360 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Metropolitan Tobacco Co. v. Shotz
93 Misc. 2d 671 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)
Fidelis Corporation v. Litton Industries, Inc.
293 F. Supp. 164 (S.D. New York, 1968)
Henry v. General Motors Corporation
236 F. Supp. 854 (N.D. New York, 1964)