Greener v. Neal

61 Miss. 204
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1883
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 61 Miss. 204 (Greener v. Neal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greener v. Neal, 61 Miss. 204 (Mich. 1883).

Opinion

Campbell, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Under § 2059, of the Code of 1880, a claim against an insolvent estate, not filed with the clerk of the court as required, is not to be embraced in the list of claims allowed. The effect of the requirement to file the claim with the clerk was to restore the rule declared in Hansell v. Forbes, 33 Miss. 42. Eegistration is a sufficient presentation of a claim to the executor, administrator, or collector, but when an estate is declared insolvent, and notice is published of a day for creditors to attend, their claims, although registered, must be filed with the clerk by the day named in the notice, so that the examination into the validity of each claim contemplated by the statute may be made.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Drainage Dist. No. 1 v. Evans
99 So. 819 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1924)
Maxey v. Goolsby
98 So. 99 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1923)
Merchants' & Farmers' Bank v. Kelleher
80 So. 697 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 Miss. 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greener-v-neal-miss-1883.