Greene v. Welboco, Inc.

460 A.2d 1378, 1983 Me. LEXIS 704
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJune 9, 1983
StatusPublished

This text of 460 A.2d 1378 (Greene v. Welboco, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greene v. Welboco, Inc., 460 A.2d 1378, 1983 Me. LEXIS 704 (Me. 1983).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

Defendants appeal from a judgment entered against them following a jury trial in Superior Court, Androscoggin County, to determine whether they were entitled to set-offs against plaintiffs’ claims. We affirm the judgment.

First, defendants contend that the presiding justice improperly excluded testimony about the operating capacity of a radio transmitter as not constituting proper rebuttal. The presiding justice’s determination of what constitutes proper rebuttal [1379]*1379must be paid considerable deference on appeal, as “he alone has the opportunity to assess the evidence with the benefit of having heard the testimony sought to be rebutted and of observing the way it went in before the jury.” Payson v. Bombardier, Ltd., 435 A.2d 411, 413 (Me.1981). On our review of the record, we find no error in the presiding justice’s ruling.

Defendants also argue that the presiding justice erred in refusing to permit them to question one of their expert witnesses about the transmitter’s compliance with FCC regulations. The record, however, again reveals no error in the presiding justice’s ruling.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Payson v. Bombardier, Ltd.
435 A.2d 411 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
460 A.2d 1378, 1983 Me. LEXIS 704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greene-v-welboco-inc-me-1983.