Greene v. United Electric Railways Co.

8 R.I. Dec. 314
CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island
DecidedMay 31, 1932
DocketNo. 86980
StatusPublished

This text of 8 R.I. Dec. 314 (Greene v. United Electric Railways Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greene v. United Electric Railways Co., 8 R.I. Dec. 314 (R.I. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

POULIOT, J.

This case is before the Court on defendant’s motion for a new trial after a jury verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of '$90.

This matter presents a clear dispute of fact. The plaintiff claims he was crossing Washington Street at Eddy [315]*315Street, in Providence, wlien lie was obliged to stop on tbe in-bound trolley tracks on- account of traffic ahead of him; that when he had been so stopped for about three seconds, his automobile was struck by a trolley car.

For plaintiff: Frank H. Beilin. For defendant: Clifford, Whipple & E. A. 'Sweeney.

The defendant claims that while the trolley car was about half way across Eddy Street, the plaintiff speeded up his car and attempted to cross in front of the trolley car but a collision under the circumstances was unavoidable.

While the Court sitting without a jury might have reached a conclusion other than, the verdict returned by the jury, yet it cannot say that there is insufficient evidence to warrant the jury’s finding.

Motion for new trial denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 R.I. Dec. 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greene-v-united-electric-railways-co-risuperct-1932.