Greene v. Town of Lakeport

California Court of Appeal

Greene v. Town of Lakeport

227 P. 645, 67 Cal. App. 379, 1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 458

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 20, 1924

DocketCiv. No. 2809.

StatusPublished

This text of 227 P. 645 (Greene v. Town of Lakeport) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greene v. Town of Lakeport, 227 P. 645, 67 Cal. App. 379, 1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 458 (Cal. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

Respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal herein on the ground that no properly certified transcript on appeal has been filed.

The appeal is taken upon the judgment-roll alone. The transcript is printed and, as originally filed, contained what purported to be copies of the judgment-roll and the notice of appeal, With the clerk’s certificate attached thereto. Neither the clerk’s signature nor seal appeared upon either certificate, but his name appeared in print at the end thereof. At the hearing of the motion appellant asked permission to file an authenticated copy of the transcript and, permission being granted, it has filed a duly certified copy thereof. Under the same cover containing the printed transcript, appellant has set out what purports to be a statement of the facts material to the ease. This statement is no part of the record on appeal and it is ordered that the same be stricken therefrom.

Under the authority of Rule XV of the supreme court, the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied. (Warren v. Hopkins, 110 Cal. 506 [42 Pac. 986]; Swortfiguer v. White, 137 Cal. 391 [70 Pac. 214]; Garraway v. Jennings, 189 Cal. 97 [207 Pac. 554]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

Respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal herein on the ground that no properly certified transcript on appeal has been filed.

The appeal is taken upon the judgment-roll alone. The transcript is printed and, as originally filed, contained what purported to be copies of the judgment-roll and the notice of appeal, With the clerk’s certificate attached thereto. Neither the clerk’s signature nor seal appeared upon either certificate, but his name appeared in print at the end thereof. At the hearing of the motion appellant asked permission to file an authenticated copy of the transcript and, permission being granted, it has filed a duly certified copy thereof. Under the same cover containing the printed transcript, appellant has set out what purports to be a statement of the facts material to the ease. This statement is no part of the record on appeal and it is ordered that the same be stricken therefrom.

Under the authority of Rule XV of the supreme court, the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied. (Warren v. Hopkins, 110 Cal. 506 [42 Pac. 986]; Swortfiguer v. White, 137 Cal. 391 [70 Pac. 214]; Garraway v. Jennings, 189 Cal. 97 [207 Pac. 554]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

227 P. 645, 67 Cal. App. 379, 1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greene-v-town-of-lakeport-calctapp-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack