Greene v. Stouffer

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 20, 2002
Docket02-6493
StatusUnpublished

This text of Greene v. Stouffer (Greene v. Stouffer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greene v. Stouffer, (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6493

VICTOR COLLYN GREENE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Warden; STEWART SIMMS, Secretary,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA- 02-328-JFM)

Submitted: August 15, 2002 Decided: August 20, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Victor Collyn Greene, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Victor Collyn Greene seeks to appeal the district court’s

orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See

Greene v. Stouffer, No. CA-02-328-JFM (D. Md. Feb. 6 & 21, 2002).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Greene v. Stouffer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greene-v-stouffer-ca4-2002.