Greene v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Greene v. State

927 S.W.2d 577, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1509, 1996 WL 509538

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 6, 1996

DocketNo. 20714

StatusPublished

This text of 927 S.W.2d 577 (Greene v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greene v. State, 927 S.W.2d 577, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1509, 1996 WL 509538 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Renae Greene (movant) appeals an order denying a Rule 29.15 motion. This court affirms.

[578]*578Movant presents one point relied on. It states:

The hearing court clearly erred in overruling [movant’s] postconviction motion because [movant] received ineffective assistance of trial counsel.

Rule 84.04(d) applies to appeals in post-conviction motion proceedings. Turner v. State, 669 S.W.2d 642, 644 (Mo.App.1984); Haynes v. State, 661 S.W.2d 76, 78 (Mo.App.1983). It states, “The points relied on shall state briefly and concisely what actions or rulings of the court are sought to be reviewed and wherein and why they are claimed to be erroneous,.... ”

Movant’s point relied on is patently conclu-sory. It yields no clue as to wherein and why movant claims the representation she received in the underlying criminal ease was ineffective. The point preserves nothing for appellate review. Kennedy v. State, 771 S.W.2d 852, 855 (Mo.App.1989). The order denying movant’s Rule 29.15 motion is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI