Greene v. Shearin

473 F. App'x 226
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 9, 2012·No. No. 12-6030·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

David Buford Greene appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Greene v. Shearin, No. 8:11-cv-00535-RWT, 2011 WL 6369568 (D.Md. Dec. 19, 2011). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Greene v. Shearin, 473 F. App'x 226 (4th Cir. 2012).

473 F. App'x 226 (Greene v. Shearin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related