Greene v. Obama
This text of 633 F. App'x 196 (Greene v. Obama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Kenneth A. Greene appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint purporting to raise several civil claims against Defendants, and denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and agree that Greene’s complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We thus affirm the district court’s orders. Greene v. Obama, No. 1:15-cv-00658-RDB (D. Md. Mar. 25, 2015; Sept. 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
633 F. App'x 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greene-v-obama-ca4-2016.