Greene v. Masten

66 Ill. App. 345, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 683
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided June 29, 1896·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Gary

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The appellant sued the appellees upon a promissory note for one hundred dollars, indorsed to him by the payee, of which the “Economy Dry Paste Company” was the maker. Of that company the appellees were officers, but the certificate of organization of the company was not filed in the recorder’s office'. The appellees are therefore liable for the debts of the company. We have waited long for the Supreme Court to decide Loverin v. McLaughlin, in which wc held (46 Ill. App. 373) that proposition to be law, and in 161 Ill. 417, onr decision is affirmed.

It follows that the appellant was entitled to recover, if the company owed the money the note calls for, and therefore the judgment in favor of the appellees is reversed and the cause remanded.

Eon-joinder of defendants is only matter in abatement, waived by proceeding on the merits. Puterbaugh PI. & Pr., 158.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Greene v. Masten, 66 Ill. App. 345, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 683 (Ill. Ct. App. 1896).

66 Ill. App. 345 (Greene v. Masten) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pease v. Chicago Crayon Co.
167 Ill. App. 31 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1912)
Northeastern Coal Co. v. Tyrrell
133 Ill. App. 472 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1907)