Greene v. LNV Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Greene v. LNV Corp.

554 F. App'x 218

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 12, 2014

DocketNo. 13-1660

StatusPublished

This text of 554 F. App'x 218 (Greene v. LNV Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greene v. LNV Corp., 554 F. App'x 218 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin S. Greene and Barbara J. Us-sery-Greene appeal from the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice their amended complaint in which they asserted that the improper substitution of trustee by Defendant, LNV Corporation, resulted in the foreclosure on their property and subsequent injuries. Our review of the record and the arguments of the parties discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Greene v. LNV Corp., No. 3:12-cv-00780-REP-MHL, 2013 WL 1652232 (ED.Va. Apr. 16, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin S. Greene and Barbara J. Us-sery-Greene appeal from the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice their amended complaint in which they asserted that the improper substitution of trustee by Defendant, LNV Corporation, resulted in the foreclosure on their property and subsequent injuries. Our review of the record and the arguments of the parties discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Greene v. LNV Corp., No. 3:12-cv-00780-REP-MHL, 2013 WL 1652232 (ED.Va. Apr. 16, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

554 F. App'x 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greene-v-lnv-corp-ca4-2014.