Greene v. . Jackson
This text of 135 S.E. 851 (Greene v. . Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case was before ns on demurrer at the Fall Term,. 1925, 190 N. C., 789. On the second trial in thé Superior Court, from which the present appeal is prosecuted, the controversy narrowed itself principally to issues of fact, determinable alone by a jury. A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried substantially in accord with the principles of law applicable, and that the validity of the trial should be sustained. All matters in dispute have been settled by the verdict, and no action on the part of the trial court has been discovered by us which we apprehend should be held for reversible error, even though some of the rulings are not altogether free from difficulty.
We have concluded that the exceptions relating to the admission and exclusion of evidence, and those to the charge, should be resolved in favor of the validity of the trial. The case presents no new question of law, or one not heretofore settled by our decisions. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
135 S.E. 851, 192 N.C. 829, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greene-v-jackson-nc-1926.