Greene v. . Jackson

135 S.E. 851, 192 N.C. 829, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 442
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Greene v. . Jackson. Read the opinion of the Court — 190 N.C. 789
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 15, 1926·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

This case was before ns on demurrer at the Fall Term,. 1925, 190 N. C., 789. On the second trial in thé Superior Court, from which the present appeal is prosecuted, the controversy narrowed itself principally to issues of fact, determinable alone by a jury. A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried substantially in accord with the principles of law applicable, and that the validity of the trial should be sustained. All matters in dispute have been settled by the verdict, and no action on the part of the trial court has been discovered by us which we apprehend should be held for reversible error, even though some of the rulings are not altogether free from difficulty.

We have concluded that the exceptions relating to the admission and exclusion of evidence, and those to the charge, should be resolved in favor of the validity of the trial. The case presents no new question of law, or one not heretofore settled by our decisions. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Greene v. . Jackson, 135 S.E. 851, 192 N.C. 829, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 442 (N.C. 1926).

135 S.E. 851 (Greene v. . Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Greene v. . Jackson
130 S.E. 732 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1925)