Greene v. Greene

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Greene v. Greene

250 A.D.2d 572, 672 N.Y.S.2d 746, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4915

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 4, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 250 A.D.2d 572 (Greene v. Greene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greene v. Greene, 250 A.D.2d 572, 672 N.Y.S.2d 746, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant former husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), dated May 15, 1997, which, inter alia, awarded him only $3,500 as his equitable share of the marital property.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, his minimal contribution to this five-year marriage justified the Supreme Court’s distributive award to him of only $3,500 (see, Arvantides v Arvantides, 64 NY2d 1033; Harris v Harris, 242 AD2d 558; Whispell v Whispell, 144 AD2d 804; Barnes v Barnes, 106 AD2d 535).

We have reviewed the appellant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant former husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), dated May 15, 1997, which, inter alia, awarded him only $3,500 as his equitable share of the marital property.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, his minimal contribution to this five-year marriage justified the Supreme Court’s distributive award to him of only $3,500 (see, Arvantides v Arvantides, 64 NY2d 1033; Harris v Harris, 242 AD2d 558; Whispell v Whispell, 144 AD2d 804; Barnes v Barnes, 106 AD2d 535).

We have reviewed the appellant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D.2d 572, 672 N.Y.S.2d 746, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greene-v-greene-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack