Greene v. City of Ann Arbor
This text of 219 N.W. 602 (Greene v. City of Ann Arbor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff, the widow of Frank J. Greene, filed a claim for compensation under the workmen’s compensation act. On final hearing before the com *453 mission, it was held that her claim was barred because not made within two years after the accident which resulted in her husband’s death.
This question was before us in the recent case of Hovey v. Construction Co., ante, 84, and it was there held that this statutory limitation did not apply to such a claim. It is but fair to the commission to say that language used in Millaley v. City of Grand Rapids, 231 Mich. 10, was capable of the construction they placed upon it. For this reason, the award must be vacated, with costs to plaintiff.
The defendant, however, also insists that the record discloses that plaintiff’s husband in his lifetime made a claim for and accepted compensation from others, in whose immediate employ he was at the time of the accident, for the injury which he received, and that he thereby elected not to take under the provisions of the act. This presented a question of fact which was not passed upon by the commission.
The record will be remanded for further action not inconsistent herewith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
219 N.W. 602, 242 Mich. 452, 1928 Mich. LEXIS 804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greene-v-city-of-ann-arbor-mich-1928.