Greene v. Brand

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Greene v. Brand

61 A.D.2d 791, 402 N.Y.S.2d 182, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10210

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 6, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 61 A.D.2d 791 (Greene v. Brand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greene v. Brand, 61 A.D.2d 791, 402 N.Y.S.2d 182, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10210 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover one half of the proceeds of the sale of certain real property allegedly owned by plaintiff and her deceased husband either as tenants by the entirety or tenants in common, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 8, 1977, as granted the branch of plaintiff’s motion which sought to strike defendant’s fifth affirmative defense, which was based upon an antenuptial agreement between plaintiff and her husband, defendant’s decedent. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements, on the memorandum decision of Mr. Justice Rodell at Special Term. (See, also, Matter of Maguire, 251 App Div 337.) Martuscello, J. P., Rabin, Cohalan and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover one half of the proceeds of the sale of certain real property allegedly owned by plaintiff and her deceased husband either as tenants by the entirety or tenants in common, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 8, 1977, as granted the branch of plaintiff’s motion which sought to strike defendant’s fifth affirmative defense, which was based upon an antenuptial agreement between plaintiff and her husband, defendant’s decedent. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements, on the memorandum decision of Mr. Justice Rodell at Special Term. (See, also, Matter of Maguire, 251 App Div 337.) Martuscello, J. P., Rabin, Cohalan and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 A.D.2d 791, 402 N.Y.S.2d 182, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greene-v-brand-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack