Greene v 207-213 W. 144th St. Hous. Dev. Fund Corp. 2024 NY Slip Op 32664(U) July 31, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 652393/2023 Judge: James E. d'Auguste Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 652393/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2024
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: Hon. James E. d’Auguste PART 55 Justice ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X INDEX NO. 652393/2023 LATONIA GREENE, MOTION DATE 08/28/2023 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 001 -v- 207-213 WEST 144TH STREET HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORP., LAURINE JACKSON, BENJAMIN BAKER, DWIGHT JORDAN, MALIKA CHERRY, DECISION + ORDER ON LEAH FRANCIS, BEVERLY YVETTE SAVAGE, NEW MOTION BEDFORD MANAGEMENT CORP., JOHN DOE NOS. 1-20,
Defendants. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 were read on this motion to/for DISMISSAL .
Defendants 207-213 West 144th Street Housing Development Fund Corp. (“207-213 West
144th Street” or “Co-op”), Laurine Jackson, Benjamin Baker, Dwight Jordan, Malika Cherry,
Leah Francis, Beverly Yvette Savage (collectively, the “Individual Board Members”) and New
Bedford Management Corp. (“New Bedford”) seek an order, pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1), (5),
(7), dismissing plaintiff Latonia Greene’s complaint. The motion is granted.
The gravamen of plaintiff’s cause of action is that she has been wrongfully deprived for a
20-year-period of her rights as a cooperative shareholder of 207-213 West 144th Street. Plaintiff
also asserts claims relating to purported discrimination based upon her sexual orientation, failure
to make repairs, improper assessments, and illegally preventing access to corporate books and
records. As a result of the aforementioned alleged conduct, plaintiff has filed claims seeking a
declaration and injunctive relief relating to her claim to be a shareholder of the subject co-op,
discrimination claims under the New York State Human Rights Law (“NYSHRL”) and New
652393/2023 GREENE, LATONIA vs. 207-213 WEST 144TH STREET HOUSING DEVELOPMENT Page 1 of 4 FUND CORP. ET AL Motion No. 001
1 of 4 [* 1] INDEX NO. 652393/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2024
York City Human Rights Law (“NYCHRL”), and, pursuant to Business Corporation Law
(“BCL”) 624, Court-directed access to the Co-op’s books and records.
Plaintiff’s assertion that she was wrongfully deprived of shareholder status is time-barred.
In 2004, plaintiff was informed that she was not a shareholder because she did not meet the
eligibility requirements for the cooperative conversion. The conversion documents provide:
A tenant is eligible to buy shares for $250 only if, 15 days after the Notification Date, the tenant is current in rent or has committed to pay the arrears under a signed payment agreement with the Tenant Association.
NYSCEF Doc. No. 19. Plaintiff has never submitted documentation showing that she was not in
arrears, and such documentation that does exist shows that plaintiff had a substantial arrearage.
Plaintiff appears to base her entitlement to shareholder status on her payment of the $250
purchase price, but a ledger entry from 2004 states: “$250 received for payment towards
purchase. Stipulation to purchase required tenant to be up to date in rental payments as of
December 2003. Tenant was in arrears $3,015.” Due to the rental arrearage, the $250 payment
was credited to plaintiff’s rental arrears, which apparently remained in arrears for at least another
decade. Plaintiff has been given multiple opportunities to demonstrate her purported entitlement
to shareholder status, which required a demonstration that she was not in rental arrears within 15
days of the notification date of the cooperative conversion. On April 7, 2017, plaintiff asserts in
her verified complaint that the Co-op notified her that it was refusing to provide her with shares
of cooperative stock and proprietary lease. NYSCEF Doc. No. 2 at ¶33 (verified complaint). On
that date, plaintiff also was required to sign a standard rental lease with 207-213 West 144th.
NYSCEF Doc. No. 2 at Ex. 3. This decision was again documented in a May 19, 2019, letter
wherein the Co-op reiterated that plaintiff was not a shareholder, and her monthly payments have
never been maintenance but rent. NYSCEF Doc. No. 24.
652393/2023 GREENE, LATONIA vs. 207-213 WEST 144TH STREET HOUSING DEVELOPMENT Page 2 of 4 FUND CORP. ET AL Motion No. 001
2 of 4 [* 2] INDEX NO. 652393/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2024
Pursuant to CPLR 217(a), Plaintiff had four months from April 7, 2017, to timely
commence this litigation challenging the Co-op’s decision to reject her status as a shareholder.
Buttitta v. Greenwich House Co-op Apartments, Inc., 22 A.D.3d 250, 251 (1st Dep’t 2004).
Plaintiff’s contention that the four-month statute of limitations only applies to government
agencies lacks merit as the appellate courts have applied this statute of limitations to challenges to
residential cooperative board decisions. Id. Likewise without merit is plaintiff’s contention her
cause of action did not accrue until 2023, which is when her attorney sent new letters again
demanding that plaintiff be recognized as a shareholder. Plaintiff’s cause of action accrued when
she was first notified of the negative determination and could reasonably understand its
consequences. Johns v. Rampe, 23 A.D.3d 283, 284 (1st Dep’t 2005). At the outside, plaintiff is
deemed to have understood the consequences of the Board’s decision when they rejected her
shareholder status in 2017 and required her to physically sign a rental lease agreement for her
apartment.
Next, the breach of fiduciary duty claim against the individual members fails to state a
potential meritorious cause of action. Claims asserting breach of fiduciary duty have a
heightened pleading standard. Plaintiff was “required to plead with specificity independent
tortious acts by each individual defendant.” Pelton v. 77 Park Ave. Condo., 38 A.D.3d 1, 9-10
(1st Dep’t 2006). With the exception of one individual, plaintiff’s pleadings are devoid of any
factual allegations. As for the one allegation directed at a board member—that the individual
blocked plaintiff’s trash room access—it is not a basis for a breach of fiduciary claim. In any
event, the board members did not owe plaintiff a fiduciary duty. As the cooperative conversion
agreement, coupled with the contemporaneous rental ledger for subject apartment, make plain,
652393/2023 GREENE, LATONIA vs. 207-213 WEST 144TH STREET HOUSING DEVELOPMENT Page 3 of 4 FUND CORP. ET AL Motion No. 001
3 of 4 [* 3] INDEX NO. 652393/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2024
plaintiff was not entitled to become a shareholder by paying $250 in 2004 because she was in
rental arrears at the time.
Further, plaintiff has failed to state a cause of action for discrimination under either
NYSHRL or NYCHRL. The complaint is devoid of factual allegations sufficient to show a cause
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Greene v 207-213 W. 144th St. Hous. Dev. Fund Corp. 2024 NY Slip Op 32664(U) July 31, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 652393/2023 Judge: James E. d'Auguste Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 652393/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2024
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: Hon. James E. d’Auguste PART 55 Justice ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X INDEX NO. 652393/2023 LATONIA GREENE, MOTION DATE 08/28/2023 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 001 -v- 207-213 WEST 144TH STREET HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORP., LAURINE JACKSON, BENJAMIN BAKER, DWIGHT JORDAN, MALIKA CHERRY, DECISION + ORDER ON LEAH FRANCIS, BEVERLY YVETTE SAVAGE, NEW MOTION BEDFORD MANAGEMENT CORP., JOHN DOE NOS. 1-20,
Defendants. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 were read on this motion to/for DISMISSAL .
Defendants 207-213 West 144th Street Housing Development Fund Corp. (“207-213 West
144th Street” or “Co-op”), Laurine Jackson, Benjamin Baker, Dwight Jordan, Malika Cherry,
Leah Francis, Beverly Yvette Savage (collectively, the “Individual Board Members”) and New
Bedford Management Corp. (“New Bedford”) seek an order, pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1), (5),
(7), dismissing plaintiff Latonia Greene’s complaint. The motion is granted.
The gravamen of plaintiff’s cause of action is that she has been wrongfully deprived for a
20-year-period of her rights as a cooperative shareholder of 207-213 West 144th Street. Plaintiff
also asserts claims relating to purported discrimination based upon her sexual orientation, failure
to make repairs, improper assessments, and illegally preventing access to corporate books and
records. As a result of the aforementioned alleged conduct, plaintiff has filed claims seeking a
declaration and injunctive relief relating to her claim to be a shareholder of the subject co-op,
discrimination claims under the New York State Human Rights Law (“NYSHRL”) and New
652393/2023 GREENE, LATONIA vs. 207-213 WEST 144TH STREET HOUSING DEVELOPMENT Page 1 of 4 FUND CORP. ET AL Motion No. 001
1 of 4 [* 1] INDEX NO. 652393/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2024
York City Human Rights Law (“NYCHRL”), and, pursuant to Business Corporation Law
(“BCL”) 624, Court-directed access to the Co-op’s books and records.
Plaintiff’s assertion that she was wrongfully deprived of shareholder status is time-barred.
In 2004, plaintiff was informed that she was not a shareholder because she did not meet the
eligibility requirements for the cooperative conversion. The conversion documents provide:
A tenant is eligible to buy shares for $250 only if, 15 days after the Notification Date, the tenant is current in rent or has committed to pay the arrears under a signed payment agreement with the Tenant Association.
NYSCEF Doc. No. 19. Plaintiff has never submitted documentation showing that she was not in
arrears, and such documentation that does exist shows that plaintiff had a substantial arrearage.
Plaintiff appears to base her entitlement to shareholder status on her payment of the $250
purchase price, but a ledger entry from 2004 states: “$250 received for payment towards
purchase. Stipulation to purchase required tenant to be up to date in rental payments as of
December 2003. Tenant was in arrears $3,015.” Due to the rental arrearage, the $250 payment
was credited to plaintiff’s rental arrears, which apparently remained in arrears for at least another
decade. Plaintiff has been given multiple opportunities to demonstrate her purported entitlement
to shareholder status, which required a demonstration that she was not in rental arrears within 15
days of the notification date of the cooperative conversion. On April 7, 2017, plaintiff asserts in
her verified complaint that the Co-op notified her that it was refusing to provide her with shares
of cooperative stock and proprietary lease. NYSCEF Doc. No. 2 at ¶33 (verified complaint). On
that date, plaintiff also was required to sign a standard rental lease with 207-213 West 144th.
NYSCEF Doc. No. 2 at Ex. 3. This decision was again documented in a May 19, 2019, letter
wherein the Co-op reiterated that plaintiff was not a shareholder, and her monthly payments have
never been maintenance but rent. NYSCEF Doc. No. 24.
652393/2023 GREENE, LATONIA vs. 207-213 WEST 144TH STREET HOUSING DEVELOPMENT Page 2 of 4 FUND CORP. ET AL Motion No. 001
2 of 4 [* 2] INDEX NO. 652393/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2024
Pursuant to CPLR 217(a), Plaintiff had four months from April 7, 2017, to timely
commence this litigation challenging the Co-op’s decision to reject her status as a shareholder.
Buttitta v. Greenwich House Co-op Apartments, Inc., 22 A.D.3d 250, 251 (1st Dep’t 2004).
Plaintiff’s contention that the four-month statute of limitations only applies to government
agencies lacks merit as the appellate courts have applied this statute of limitations to challenges to
residential cooperative board decisions. Id. Likewise without merit is plaintiff’s contention her
cause of action did not accrue until 2023, which is when her attorney sent new letters again
demanding that plaintiff be recognized as a shareholder. Plaintiff’s cause of action accrued when
she was first notified of the negative determination and could reasonably understand its
consequences. Johns v. Rampe, 23 A.D.3d 283, 284 (1st Dep’t 2005). At the outside, plaintiff is
deemed to have understood the consequences of the Board’s decision when they rejected her
shareholder status in 2017 and required her to physically sign a rental lease agreement for her
apartment.
Next, the breach of fiduciary duty claim against the individual members fails to state a
potential meritorious cause of action. Claims asserting breach of fiduciary duty have a
heightened pleading standard. Plaintiff was “required to plead with specificity independent
tortious acts by each individual defendant.” Pelton v. 77 Park Ave. Condo., 38 A.D.3d 1, 9-10
(1st Dep’t 2006). With the exception of one individual, plaintiff’s pleadings are devoid of any
factual allegations. As for the one allegation directed at a board member—that the individual
blocked plaintiff’s trash room access—it is not a basis for a breach of fiduciary claim. In any
event, the board members did not owe plaintiff a fiduciary duty. As the cooperative conversion
agreement, coupled with the contemporaneous rental ledger for subject apartment, make plain,
652393/2023 GREENE, LATONIA vs. 207-213 WEST 144TH STREET HOUSING DEVELOPMENT Page 3 of 4 FUND CORP. ET AL Motion No. 001
3 of 4 [* 3] INDEX NO. 652393/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2024
plaintiff was not entitled to become a shareholder by paying $250 in 2004 because she was in
rental arrears at the time.
Further, plaintiff has failed to state a cause of action for discrimination under either
NYSHRL or NYCHRL. The complaint is devoid of factual allegations sufficient to show a cause
of action premised upon her sexual orientation. It seems evident that the Co-op has uniformly
taken the position that plaintiff was ineligible to become a shareholder. This is because the
cooperative conversion agreement required tenants, such as plaintiff, to be current on their rent
within 15 days of the conversion notice date, which was over two decades ago. Thus, the refusal
of the Co-op to provide plaintiff a proprietary lease or inspect the records of the cooperative
cannot be a basis of a discrimination claim. Moreover, plaintiff has not demonstrated the
existence of purportedly discriminatory acts within either the one-year and three-year statute of
limitations periods for NYSHRL and NYCHRL, respectively.
Finally, plaintiff has no right to compel inspection of the Co-op’s records under BCL
624(b). By its terms, the right to inspect the records under this BCL provision is limited to
shareholders of the cooperation. Plaintiff is not a cooperative shareholder. As a non-shareholder,
plaintiff is not permitted access to the Co-op’s records under this statutory provision.
Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is granted and the Clerk is directed to dismiss the
verified complaint with prejudice.
This constitutes the decision and order of this Court.
7/31/2024 $SIG$ DATE James d’Auguste, J.S.C. CHECK ONE: X CASE DISPOSED NON-FINAL DISPOSITION
X GRANTED DENIED GRANTED IN PART OTHER
APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER
CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT REFERENCE
652393/2023 GREENE, LATONIA vs. 207-213 WEST 144TH STREET HOUSING DEVELOPMENT Page 4 of 4 FUND CORP. ET AL Motion No. 001
4 of 4 [* 4]