Greene Steel & Wire Co. v. Meyers Bros. Operations, Inc.
This text of 44 Misc. 2d 646 (Greene Steel & Wire Co. v. Meyers Bros. Operations, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff alleged a cause of action for breach of a contract of bailment. Whether a person simply hires a place to put his car or whether he has turned its possession over to the care and custody of another depends on the place and conditions of the transaction (Osborn v. Cline, 263 N. Y. 434, 437). The place and conditions of the instant transaction are undisputed and are set forth with sufficient specificity to warrant a determination as a matter of law. The manner of operation of defendant’s parking lot, the posted signs and the ticket plaintiff obtained defining the service sold, and the circumstance that plaintiff never surrendered possession or control of its vehicle to the defendant, establish that the plaintiff acquired a mere license or privilege to park its car. Defendant assumed no responsibility for .safekeeping such vehicle and is not responsible for its damage.
The order so far as appealed from should be reversed, with $10 costs, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment granted.
Concur — Hofstadter, J. P., Tilzer and Gold, JJ.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 Misc. 2d 646, 254 N.Y.S.2d 299, 1964 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greene-steel-wire-co-v-meyers-bros-operations-inc-nysupct-1964.