Greenblatt v. Victor Adding Machine Co.

163 So. 2d 759, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2687
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 15, 1964
DocketNo. 33244
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 163 So. 2d 759 (Greenblatt v. Victor Adding Machine Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greenblatt v. Victor Adding Machine Co., 163 So. 2d 759, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2687 (Fla. 1964).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 26,1963.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THORNAL, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hembree v. Reaves
266 So. 2d 362 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 So. 2d 759, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenblatt-v-victor-adding-machine-co-fla-1964.