Greenblatt v. Victor Adding Machine Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Greenblatt v. Victor Adding Machine Co.

163 So. 2d 759, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2687

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 15, 1964·No. No. 33244·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 26,1963.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THORNAL, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 26,1963.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THORNAL, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Greenblatt v. Victor Adding Machine Co., 163 So. 2d 759, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2687 (Fla. 1964).

Pincite

163 So. 2d 759 (Greenblatt v. Victor Adding Machine Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related