Greenberg v. Rosoff Realties, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Greenberg v. Rosoff Realties, Inc.

10 A.D.2d 832, 200 N.Y.S.2d 356, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10551

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 19, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 832 (Greenberg v. Rosoff Realties, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greenberg v. Rosoff Realties, Inc., 10 A.D.2d 832, 200 N.Y.S.2d 356, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10551 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting a motion of plain tiff-respondent to vacate the dismissal of the complaint unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to condition the granting of the motion upon payment by plain tiff-respondent of a full bill of costs to date, and the order is otherwise affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant. The reasons for the delays in prosecution are such that the further imposition of costs is warranted. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, M. M. Frank and Valente, JJ.; McNally, J., dissents and votes to reverse and deny the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting a motion of plain tiff-respondent to vacate the dismissal of the complaint unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to condition the granting of the motion upon payment by plain tiff-respondent of a full bill of costs to date, and the order is otherwise affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant. The reasons for the delays in prosecution are such that the further imposition of costs is warranted. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, M. M. Frank and Valente, JJ.; McNally, J., dissents and votes to reverse and deny the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 832, 200 N.Y.S.2d 356, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenberg-v-rosoff-realties-inc-nyappdiv-1960.