Greenberg v. Robertson-Stelling Corp.
This text of 127 Misc. 427 (Greenberg v. Robertson-Stelling Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Plaintiff was bound to anticipate that defendant’s automobile as it approached the crossing at Broadway and Eighty-sixth street, the rear of said automobile being then ten feet ahead of plaintiff’s car, might be stopped by traffic regulations or otherwise, and under the circumstances the running of plaintiff’s car into the end of defendant’s car when that car stopped at Eighty-sixth street indicated plaintiff’s lack of control of his car and established contributory negligence on the plaintiff’s part, thus barring a recovery.
Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.
Present: Bi.tur, Delehanty and Wagner, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 Misc. 427, 216 N.Y.S. 340, 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1009, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenberg-v-robertson-stelling-corp-nyappterm-1926.