Greenberg v. Kenney

215 N.E.2d 788, 350 Mass. 778
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedApril 5, 1966
StatusPublished

This text of 215 N.E.2d 788 (Greenberg v. Kenney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greenberg v. Kenney, 215 N.E.2d 788, 350 Mass. 778 (Mass. 1966).

Opinion

In this action of tort for personal injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident, the plaintiff by exception raises the question as to whether the trial court was in error in instructions given the jury relating to the burden of proof and in refusing to instruct the jury on this point as requested by him. In our view the judge gave adequate instruction on the burden resting upon the plaintiff and properly defined the meaning of “fair preponderance of the evidence.” The judge’s charge was sufficient to enable the jury to resolve any “doubt whether a fair preponderance of the evidence established the essential facts.” Callahan v. Fleischman Co. 262 Mass. 437, 438 — 439. Mahoney v. Boston Elev. Ry. 271 Mass. 274, 280.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Callahan v. Fleischman Co.
160 N.E. 249 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1928)
Mahoney v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
171 N.E. 662 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
215 N.E.2d 788, 350 Mass. 778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenberg-v-kenney-mass-1966.