Greenberg v. Karnetsky

188 Misc. 674, 71 N.Y.S.2d 535, 1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2591
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided February 27, 1947·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Memorandum There is nothing, in the record to warrant a finding that the landlord does not intend to use the Office of Price Administration certificate for the purpose for which it was issued. Nor is there any evidence to support the claim that there was a renewal of a prior written lease. The tenant was not a party thereto and she presented no proof tending to show her right to succeed to the interest of the tenant named therein. Acceptance of rent by the landlord after issuance of the certificate and during pendency of the summary proceedings is no bar to their continuance. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1410, subd. 8.)

The final order and judgment should be reversed upon the law and facts, with $30 costs to the landlord, and final order directed in favor of the landlord. Stay of warrant is granted until April Í, 1947.

MacCratb, Steinbrink and Fennelly, JJ., concur.

Order and judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Greenberg v. Karnetsky, 188 Misc. 674, 71 N.Y.S.2d 535, 1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2591 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

188 Misc. 674 (Greenberg v. Karnetsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Greenburger v. Leary
119 Misc. 2d 358 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1983)
Greenberg v. Karnetsky
272 A.D.2d 778 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947)