Greenberg v. Greenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Greenberg v. Greenberg

27 A.D.2d 952, 279 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4372

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 24, 1967

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 27 A.D.2d 952 (Greenberg v. Greenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greenberg v. Greenberg, 27 A.D.2d 952, 279 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4372 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated November 17, 1966, modified, on the law and the facts, by (1) granting defendant’s motion to the extent of amending the judgment of divorce so that the direction for support payments shall be only for plaintiff’s support and (2) reducing the amount of the support payments from $75 a week to $50 a week. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. Findings of fact below which are inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings are made as indicated herein. Defendant’s obligation to support his child, absent exceptional circumstances, terminated when the child attained his majority (Sloan v. Sloan, 286 App. Div. 1102). The fact that the son is pursuing post-graduate work is not an unusual circumstance (Halsted v. Halsted, 228 App. Div. 298). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated November 17, 1966, modified, on the law and the facts, by (1) granting defendant’s motion to the extent of amending the judgment of divorce so that the direction for support payments shall be only for plaintiff’s support and (2) reducing the amount of the support payments from $75 a week to $50 a week. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. Findings of fact below which are inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings are made as indicated herein. Defendant’s obligation to support his child, absent exceptional circumstances, terminated when the child attained his majority (Sloan v. Sloan, 286 App. Div. 1102). The fact that the son is pursuing post-graduate work is not an unusual circumstance (Halsted v. Halsted, 228 App. Div. 298). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 952, 279 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenberg-v-greenberg-nyappdiv-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack