Greenberg v. Greenberg
This text of 823 So. 2d 176 (Greenberg v. Greenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The husband appeals a temporary alimony and child support order entered by the trial court following this court’s reversal of the final judgment of dissolution as it related to alimony and child support. We affirm, but write to address a concern expressed during oral argument. The husband expressed a concern in his briefs and at oral argument that the trial court would be bound at the final hearing by findings in the order for temporary relief made after a thirty minute hearing at which limited evidence was permitted to be [177]*177introduced. The wife’s counsel agreed during oral argument that the trial court’s findings would not be binding in the upcoming trial. We agree.
The factual findings in the temporary order on alimony and child support do not restrict the trial court from determining alimony and child support in accordance with the evidence presented at the final hearing and the applicable law. The final hearing should be conducted in accordance with the directions from this court set forth in Greenberg v. Greenberg, 793 So.2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
823 So. 2d 176, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9633, 2002 WL 1466871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenberg-v-greenberg-fladistctapp-2002.