Greenberg v. Fastener Co.

Ninth Circuit

Greenberg v. Fastener Co.

98 F.2d 1020, 38 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 555, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3384

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 6, 1938

DocketNos. 8968, 8969

StatusPublished

This text of 98 F.2d 1020 (Greenberg v. Fastener Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greenberg v. Fastener Co., 98 F.2d 1020, 38 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 555, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3384 (9th Cir. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon stipulation of counsel for respective parties in each of above causes for dismissal of the appeal in each cause, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered appeal in each of above causes, 18 F.Supp. 296, dismissed, that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered in each cause in accordance with the stipulation filed therein, and that the mandate of this court in each cause issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon stipulation of counsel for respective parties in each of above causes for dismissal of the appeal in each cause, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered appeal in each of above causes, 18 F.Supp. 296, dismissed, that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered in each cause in accordance with the stipulation filed therein, and that the mandate of this court in each cause issue forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 F.2d 1020, 38 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 555, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenberg-v-fastener-co-ca9-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack