Greenberg v. Fastener Co.

98 F.2d 1020, 38 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 555, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3384
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 6, 1938·No. Nos. 8968, 8969·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon stipulation of counsel for respective parties in each of above causes for dismissal of the appeal in each cause, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered appeal in each of above causes, 18 F.Supp. 296, dismissed, that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered in each cause in accordance with the stipulation filed therein, and that the mandate of this court in each cause issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Greenberg v. Fastener Co., 98 F.2d 1020, 38 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 555, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3384 (9th Cir. 1938).

98 F.2d 1020 (Greenberg v. Fastener Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hookless Fastener Co. v. Greenberg
18 F. Supp. 296 (S.D. California, 1937)