Greenberg v. Cuomo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Greenberg v. Cuomo

70 A.D.2d 880, 417 N.Y.S.2d 875, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12455

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 4, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 70 A.D.2d 880 (Greenberg v. Cuomo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greenberg v. Cuomo, 70 A.D.2d 880, 417 N.Y.S.2d 875, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12455 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review so much of a determination of the respondent Secretary of State, dated November 8, 1978 and made after a hearing, as found that petitioner violated section 337-a of the Real Property Law (regarding the sale or lease of subdivided lands) and revoked his real estate broker’s licenses pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 338 and section 441-c of the Real Property Law. Determination confirmed insofar as reviewed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with costs. The determination of the respondent Secretary of State is supported by substantial evidence and the penalty imposed is not shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). Hopkins, J. P., Suozzi, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review so much of a determination of the respondent Secretary of State, dated November 8, 1978 and made after a hearing, as found that petitioner violated section 337-a of the Real Property Law (regarding the sale or lease of subdivided lands) and revoked his real estate broker’s licenses pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 338 and section 441-c of the Real Property Law. Determination confirmed insofar as reviewed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with costs. The determination of the respondent Secretary of State is supported by substantial evidence and the penalty imposed is not shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). Hopkins, J. P., Suozzi, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 A.D.2d 880, 417 N.Y.S.2d 875, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenberg-v-cuomo-nyappdiv-1979.