Greenberg v. Connor

Appellate Court of Illinois

Greenberg v. Connor

189 Ill. App. 419

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided November 10, 1914·No. Gen. No. 19,947·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Execution, § 302*—when rule as to extrinsic evidence inapplicable. The rule that where there are several counts in the declaration" and malice is the gist of some but not of others, the question whether extrinsic evidence may be resorted- to to determine under which count the verdict was rendered, is not applicable where each count charges malice and the judgment necessarily involves the determination of that question as one of the issues.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Execution, § 302*—when rule as to extrinsic evidence inapplicable. The rule that where there are several counts in the declaration" and malice is the gist of some but not of others, the question whether extrinsic evidence may be resorted- to to determine under which count the verdict was rendered, is not applicable where each count charges malice and the judgment necessarily involves the determination of that question as one of the issues.

Greenberg v. Connor, 189 Ill. App. 419 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

189 Ill. App. 419 (Greenberg v. Connor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related